Is the Nomad a Touring Bike?

This kinda came up in Nico's thread about Motorcyclist Magazine and in my mind the question is still a sore one for me, because I wanted the answer to be "yes".

Not because of Nico, or Motorcyclist, but because of Geico.

When I first bought my Nomad, Kawasaki listed it on their site under "Touring Bikes". In Europe it was called the Vulcan Touring Cruiser. It totally resembles in styling and equipment any touring bike from the era whose styling it emulates.

But when I got my first insurance bill from Geico, they had denied me the lower rates you get because of their highly advertized "touring bike discount."

I called them to ask why, and was told that they just did not recognize it as a touring bike, even though the manufacturer did. I asked them what piece of touring bike gear was missing from the Nomad? They had no answer for that. They simply told me their rates were based on the approved schedule as submitted to the insurance comissioner of the State of California, and it did not show the Nomad to be a touring bike because they'd decided not to submit the schedule that way.

Imagine my surprise when forum members from Eastern states, with Geico insurance, told me they WERE getting the touring bike rate. In Arkansas a nomad is a touring bike, but in California it isn't?

The funny thing is that Kawasaki has since taken the Nomad off the category of Touring Bikes on their website, but now Geico in California says it WILL be included on their schedule of touring bikes here.

WTF? over.

[cactusjack]

...it's a breath mint! It's a candy mint!

I did notice some time back that Kawasaki no longer considers the Nomad a touring bike on their own website, last year they did.

[phenrichs]

I would bet the insurance commisioner of California is probably a ........ dramatic pause.......

HD Ultra owner and based it on his own stupid opinion. It always comes down to one guys decision. Even if it is a computer system someone has to decide what the computer outputs.
Maybe the air in Sacramento is too thin.

[schoeney]

Big bags + windshield that are not quick change, an engine and driveline that are so smooth, the tall gearing, power that isn't going to win stop light to stop light...but enough to hold 75mph all day long, stock pipes that are quiet, add the water cool and shaft drive and I don't see how it can be considered anything but a tourer. Whatever they decide to call it I like it!

No, OP, he doesn't actually decide. AFAIK he just rubber stamps what the insurance companies tell him they decided to do with their rate structure. (As long as it's legal of course.)

Steve Poizner is our I.C. He's a former electrical engineer, turned school teacher, turned businessman, turned politician. I don't know if he rides, I kinda doubt it but I intend to find out.

From his website:
"Poizner was born and raised in Houston, Texas. He did his undergraduate work at the University of Texas...he was named the Top Male Student in the University...one of the Top 10 Electrical Engineering Students...moved to California...to attend Stanford...earned a Master's Degree with Honors in Business Administration. Commissioner Poizner and his wife, Carol, live in Los Gatos where they are raising their daughter, Rebecca."

[rksaw]

Cadd, IMHO the 'mad is not a Tourer, and none of us want to admit that we are old enough to enjoy a Tourer anyway.
Rich

[phenrichs]

Well personally, I don't care what the hell the rest of the world calls it. Myself, and I am sure a great many of you, would just simply call it .......

RIGHT!
The RIGHT bike for the RIGHT money for the RIGHT ride on the RIGHT day.

For you fanatics you can substitute RIGHT with PERFECT!

I personally think under the radar has its advantages. If they rated the Nomad a touring bike or the best touring bike we would be flooded with a**holes that bought it because it was on the top of the list.

[dantama]

Originally Posted by cactusjack

I did notice some time back that Kawasaki no longer considers the Nomad a touring bike on their own website, last year they did.

Maybe they took it off in anticipation of a 2000cc nomad with a batwing and trunk, and it'll be the tourer

[lw]

Tourer, Cruiser. . . it's like the old Miller Lite commercial:
"Tastes great!! Less Filling!!


Call it whatever you want, but ride it all you can.

[aj]

Is the Nomad a Touring Bike?

short answer: YES

[josh]

Is the Nomad a Touring Bike?
Isn't every bike a touring bike, I don't have a Nomad but I toured up to HSvroc, and OTI, and next weekend to the norcal run...You can tour on whatever you want to tour on, its the person that is the tourer not the bike.....Downloaded and watched Long Way Down, and halfway thru Kenya they ran into a guy on a bicycle riding around the world...He sure as hell was touring

[rlfaubion]

24,000 miles in 13 months - mine's a touring bike

This may seem silly, but the range on a tank of gas may be one ridiculous criteria.

"And while the standard version is a fine touring mount by our comfort, performance and appearance standards, it will only go approximately 120 miles on the 4.2 gallons of fuel it carries before hitting reserve. When you're riding cross-country, or through a desert with more ghost towns than real ones, limited range is a particularly serious detriment, so we were very appreciative of the addition of fuel injection on the Nomad last year, which increased its overall limit by more than 20 miles."

Motorcycle Cruiser 2001

?

[davidjones1]

just lookat it, all that classic style and a v-twin and at's its price it is the bike to own.
ride safe.

Originally Posted by Valdez (lone Juan)

24,000 miles in 13 months - mine's a touring bike

Is that Sam Elliot or Peter Fonda in that pic???