|
05-12-2015, 12:13 AM | #46 | |
Quote:
__________________
Idaho (aka Curmudgeon) Blue Knights Idaho III VBA #110 VROC #24864 IBA #49753 2007 Nomad 86,000 miles Bud Smalley Pocatello, Idaho Idaho Jack Adapter Login or Register to Remove Ads |
||
|
05-12-2015, 12:15 AM | #47 | |
Quote:
__________________
Idaho (aka Curmudgeon) Blue Knights Idaho III VBA #110 VROC #24864 IBA #49753 2007 Nomad 86,000 miles Bud Smalley Pocatello, Idaho Idaho Jack Adapter |
||
|
05-12-2015, 11:19 AM | #48 |
Jr. Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 20
|
disclosure: I only read the first two pages, so i apologize if this has been covered already.
if you are reloading your own .223 and ensuring everything is identical in each cartridge, then the issue with your spacing is either breathing, trigger control, or wind. I have no idea what type sights you're using, but assuming your eye relief is consistent, eye sight good, and scope adjustied for windage and elevation, the only other variable is your breathing and trigger control. 1 inch grouping at 100 yards is better than most people i've shot with in the military. that's actually good enough to qualify expert on some ranges. that said, if you absolutely swear that your technique is perfect and it must be your ammo, then I would suggest using 55gr BTHP from http://www.RMRbullets.com and use vhitavouri N133 at 23.9gr. i set my seating depth so that my COL is exactly 2.240. These loads consistently get me exactly 3200fps. I only use CCI small-rifle magnum primers and used brassi pick up from the base range. With my 16" 1in9 barrel, I'm hitting, on average, 10 rounds in a 1/2inch spread at 300yards with a milspec M5Xi 5-25x56 scope. on the indoor range at 25yards, my targets usually only have one hole in them when i'm done (which is rather irritating at times). |
|
05-12-2015, 11:31 AM | #49 | |
Sr. Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hot Springs, SD and other warm and dry places
Posts: 1,043
|
Quote:
I read one article and the gent video documented his "sight-in" and then a weekend of hunting. He shot several ground squirrels (looked like prairie dogs to me), a jack rabbit, and a coyote. All shots were one shot kills and the visual damage was obvious. The bullet energy at 100 yards is supposedly as good as .17 Hornet (centerfire). Most shots were under 100 yard. |
|
|
05-12-2015, 11:46 AM | #50 |
Jr. Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 20
|
oh, and...
before i get flamed, that scope is my primary for my .300 weatherby magnum. i dont ordinarily use it on my AR. I just like to reach out and touch elk at 700yards with the weatherby. i like my iron sights on the AR and i can always attach the reflex red dot if SHTF.
Login or Register to Remove Ads |
|
08-16-2015, 11:53 PM | #51 |
Here is an update. The McGowan barrel finally arrived and the gunsmith got it mounted on the action and the stock opened up to make sure it is not touching wood.
I broke in the barrel by shooting one round and cleaning the barrel, then another and clean and so on for 5 rounds, then I did 5 sets of two rounds the same way and then 5 sets of four rounds. I used cheap UMC FMJ for the break in. They were 55 gr and I really did not expect them to shoot well in the 1-8 twist varmint barrel. Back at my bench I measure the distance to the lands of the new barrel for three different bullets; 70gr Berger VLDs, 75gr A-Max and 55gr V-Max bullets. Good thing I did because the throat is a LOT shorter on this new barrel than it was on the factory tube. I loaded all of my test rounds a few thousands off of the lands. (I can make them touch if I want with this new barrel) At the range today a friend had a chronograph set up so we put my handloads through while I shot for groups. The 75gr A-Max over 23 gr of H335 gave me a 1/2 inch group of four shots. The fifth one measured at 68fps less than the other four and was 1/2 inch away from the others to open the group up to 1 inch. A test load of Varget gave the same results. Now, I'm convinced that if I can pay closer attention to the accuracy of my powder charges I can tighten my groups up to a ragged hole. That is my goal. Tomorrow I'm going to go shopping for a powder trickler and set my beam powder scale up at eye level so that it will be easier to use. I'm going to like this new McGowan barrel.
__________________
Idaho (aka Curmudgeon) Blue Knights Idaho III VBA #110 VROC #24864 IBA #49753 2007 Nomad 86,000 miles Bud Smalley Pocatello, Idaho Idaho Jack Adapter |
|
|
08-17-2015, 06:44 AM | #52 | |
Sr. Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dedham Maine
Posts: 4,199
|
Quote:
Rich
__________________
|
|
|
08-19-2015, 11:15 PM | #53 |
Here is another update. THIS BARREL IS AWESOME!!!! :-)
I carefully loaded a few test rounds and paid attention to getting every powder charge as close as possible. It paid off. I shot several ragged holes. One six shot group can almost be covered by a dime! Another 3 shot test group can be covered with a dime. I know that I can get these closer by getting anal with identical bullet weights, dual weighing the powder charges, weighing the primers and checking case capacity. I'm now a happy camper. If any of you need to replace the barrel on your rifle I can honestly say that you should give McGowen Barrels a look. The factory tomato stake would not throw different bullet weights anywhere near the same point of impact, by INCHES!! This barrel had no problem making ragged holes with slightly different points of impact between 75 grain and 55 grain bullets. NICE!
__________________
Idaho (aka Curmudgeon) Blue Knights Idaho III VBA #110 VROC #24864 IBA #49753 2007 Nomad 86,000 miles Bud Smalley Pocatello, Idaho Idaho Jack Adapter |
|
|