Register FAQ Upgrade Membership Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
Go Back   Vulcan Bagger Forums > Technical :: Maintenance :: Performance > 1500 & 1600 Nomad

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-06-2012, 09:10 PM   #16
deacon1984   deacon1984 is offline
Member
 
deacon1984's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Newark, Delaware
Posts: 133
I had a Mustang seat on my last bike, and it was an improvement over the stock seat, but I still needed the Airhawk for longer rides.

I have Day-Long seat on my Nomad, and it lives up to its name. Very comfortable on long distances.
__________________
John
VBA #1753
2008 Nomad




Login or Register to Remove Ads
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2012, 09:16 PM   #17
george james   george james is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: eastern nc
Posts: 308
Had 2 try and convince myself i had made a good investment, just couldn't find it 2 b better than stock seat. Will not buy another.
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2012, 11:00 PM   #18
duffy   duffy is offline
Sr. Member
 
duffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hot Springs, SD and other warm and dry places
Posts: 1,043
Mustangs are fine for some folks (as the comments attest) but they are not the "perfect" seat for all bottoms. I had one on a bike for about 6 months and just flat didn't like it, went with an OEM gel instead.

I have a 1500 Nomad stock seat on my 1500 Classic and I can do 350 mile days with no problem. Longer ones and I use the Airhawk also. Works for me.
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2012, 11:55 PM   #19
hammer   hammer is offline
Sr. Member
 
hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,329
I am with Duffy. I did 6129K to Utah and back in 10.5 days in hot weather with a sheepskin on the stock seat. No problem.
__________________

Hammer aka CrocHammer
KawaNow#00988, VROC#26389, VR#2202
Abbotsford, BC, Canada
2006 Black Nomad
 
Reply With Quote
Reply





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.