Motorcycle Cruiser Nomad comparison

dantama · 09-06-2008, 11:41 AM

The October issue compares the Nomad against other hardbaggers.

Here is some of what they say (they did pick the Nomad as the winner).

"The Nomad was the most popular bike whenever the roads got "twisty. Even though it ranks in the middle in terms of ground clearance, the Nomad's stiff chassis and predictable steering makes this the bike to beat in the mountains. "

The Nomad won unanimously, and by a fair margin."

"The Vulcans suspension felt a wee bit sportier, this making it the easiest to navigate at slow speeds and in city traffic, but somewhat jarring on the big bumps. The Kawasaki's brakes were superb compared with the other two, and the saddlebags held an impressive amount of gear."

It was being tested against a Road King, Rocket III, Victory Vision, and a Star Royal Star.

Magazine testers always get worse mileage than most posters on boards, because they ride them like they don't have to pay for them.

They got the same mileage out of the Nomad that I have always gotten. They got, 26.7-41.1 for an average of 35.7. That is just about how mine played out on the 1,800 mile ride to the western rally; the high low and average.

Good to see that they still like the Nomad.

dogdoc · 09-06-2008, 02:06 PM

+1 Dan/

09-06-2008, 02:20 PM

We should invite them down for a bafflectomy and a Spectre, and then they'd really go "Wow!" ;)

gopjohnny · 09-06-2008, 05:05 PM

last year I took the intruder on deals gap, this year the nomad, there was no comparison the nomad was 100% better on the curves

pirate · 09-06-2008, 10:45 PM

Good to see the Nomad gets some attention in one biker magazine!

**scion0** · 09-07-2008, 08:05 AM

Finally!

waterman · 09-07-2008, 11:19 AM

All of the magazines that have compared the Nomad to another have given the Nomad the thumbs up. One of those reviews was why I really looked at the Nomad. After riding it for the first time I could understand why!!!

gghost · 09-07-2008, 03:00 PM

Magazine review was one of the main reasons that I looked at the Nomad. Dealer didn't have much of an impact on my decision.

cactusjack · 09-08-2008, 07:02 PM

Well I finally got to read the article, my magazine came today. I'd say the Nomad more than held its own against some formidable competition. Further proof that we made the right choice, eh?

But what's with these test riders? 5'4", 5'7", 5'9". Nobody is above average height! Do they hire little people to test and review motorcycles? How about a bigger cross-section of riders, maybe someone over (gasp!) 6 feet? Nothing against shorter people, mind you - but get some big 'ol boys on them scoots, Hoss!

**scion0** · 09-08-2008, 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cactusjack

Well I finally got to read the article, my magazine came today. I'd say the Nomad more than held its own against some formidable competition. Further proof that we made the right choice, eh?

But what's with these test riders? 5'4", 5'7", 5'9". Nobody is above average height! Do they hire little people to test and review motorcycles? How about a bigger cross-section of riders, maybe someone over (gasp!) 6 feet? Nothing against shorter people, mind you - but get some big 'ol boys on them scoots, Hoss!

Good point, bet that would have made a difference in some options and results.

**coacha** · 09-08-2008, 09:46 PM

I'm glad someone else noticed the sizes of these editorial types. Seems like they are all a little on the diminutive size. They should get Todd and Davidjones to do the tests.

**Idaho** · 09-08-2008, 11:14 PM

Rats, now the secret is out so everyone will have Nads.

Actually, I am amazed at how much better the Nomad is in the twisties than my old Volusia was. Lot's more power and so much more stable in the corners that it is striking. Volusia used to bounce in corners and had a hard time holding a line, lots of shifting to drive the thing. Nomad just cruises gracefully in 5th gear. Thanks for the post Dan.

rksaw · 09-09-2008, 12:14 AM

Hey, I don't care if the secret is out. The Nomad deserves to be in 1st place! It's a great bike, with classic lines, plenty of power, lots of room in the hard bags. What is there not to like? Maybe with more looking and buying the 'Mad, more will be joining the forum as well.
Rich

cactusjack · 09-09-2008, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoachA

I'm glad someone else noticed the sizes of these editorial types. Seems like they are all a little on the diminutive size. They should get Todd and Davidjones to do the tests.

Like the 5'4" rider complaining about windshield height? Well.....duh! Probably complains about the height of urinals, too.

Another thing I don't understand is they all liked the stock seat. Either their posteriors have mutated like an apes from years in the saddle, or they don't log enough miles to "feel the pain".

dantama · 09-09-2008, 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cactusjack

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoachA

I'm glad someone else noticed the sizes of these editorial types. Seems like they are all a little on the diminutive size. They should get Todd and Davidjones to do the tests.

Like the 5'4" rider complaining about windshield height? Well.....duh! Probably complains about the height of urinals, too.

Another post that really did make me laugh out loud.

09-06-2008, 11:41 AM	#1
dantama Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Denver, CO Posts: 0	Motorcycle Cruiser Nomad comparison The October issue compares the Nomad against other hardbaggers. Here is some of what they say (they did pick the Nomad as the winner). "The Nomad was the most popular bike whenever the roads got "twisty. Even though it ranks in the middle in terms of ground clearance, the Nomad's stiff chassis and predictable steering makes this the bike to beat in the mountains. " The Nomad won unanimously, and by a fair margin." "The Vulcans suspension felt a wee bit sportier, this making it the easiest to navigate at slow speeds and in city traffic, but somewhat jarring on the big bumps. The Kawasaki's brakes were superb compared with the other two, and the saddlebags held an impressive amount of gear." It was being tested against a Road King, Rocket III, Victory Vision, and a Star Royal Star. Magazine testers always get worse mileage than most posters on boards, because they ride them like they don't have to pay for them. They got the same mileage out of the Nomad that I have always gotten. They got, 26.7-41.1 for an average of 35.7. That is just about how mine played out on the 1,800 mile ride to the western rally; the high low and average. Good to see that they still like the Nomad. Login or Register to Remove Ads
	0

09-06-2008, 02:06 PM	#2
dogdoc Top Contributor Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 5,263	Motorcycle Cruiser Nomad comparison +1 Dan/
	0

09-06-2008, 02:20 PM	#3
Guest Posts: n/a	Motorcycle Cruiser Nomad comparison We should invite them down for a bafflectomy and a Spectre, and then they'd really go "Wow!" ;)
	0

09-06-2008, 05:05 PM	#4
gopjohnny Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Moulton Alabama Posts: 304	Motorcycle Cruiser Nomad comparison last year I took the intruder on deals gap, this year the nomad, there was no comparison the nomad was 100% better on the curves
	0

09-06-2008, 10:45 PM	#5
pirate Sr. Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: North Dakota Posts: 1,865	Motorcycle Cruiser Nomad comparison Good to see the Nomad gets some attention in one biker magazine! Login or Register to Remove Ads
	0

09-07-2008, 08:05 AM	#6
scion0 Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Peoria, Illinois Posts: 1,507	Motorcycle Cruiser Nomad comparison Finally! __________________ ___________________ Mike "Scion0" VBA#: 0097 Former VBA North Central Asst Regional Leader St Jude Rides Peoria to Memphis Rider Retired MSgt, USAF (1979 -99) "Don't sweat the small stuff, and it's all small stuff!" Current ride: 2012 H-D Ultra FLHTCU (Black) Past ride: 2007 Black Nomad
	0

09-07-2008, 11:19 AM	#7
waterman Top Contributor Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Colorado Posts: 6,530	Motorcycle Cruiser Nomad comparison All of the magazines that have compared the Nomad to another have given the Nomad the thumbs up. One of those reviews was why I really looked at the Nomad. After riding it for the first time I could understand why!!! __________________ Joel "Waterman" 2017 HD Road Glide Ultra 2006 Nomad - Sold VBA 213 VROC 16913 Custer 09: Cortez 10: Crescent City 11: Kanab 12: Estes Park 13: Tahoe 14: Red Lodge 16
	0

09-07-2008, 03:00 PM	#8
gghost Advanced Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Raleigh, NC, USA Posts: 626	Motorcycle Cruiser Nomad comparison Magazine review was one of the main reasons that I looked at the Nomad. Dealer didn't have much of an impact on my decision. __________________ gghost
	0

09-08-2008, 07:02 PM	#9
cactusjack Mega-Contributor Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Where it doesn't snow...ever! Posts: 21,926	Motorcycle Cruiser Nomad comparison Well I finally got to read the article, my magazine came today. I'd say the Nomad more than held its own against some formidable competition. Further proof that we made the right choice, eh? But what's with these test riders? 5'4", 5'7", 5'9". Nobody is above average height! Do they hire little people to test and review motorcycles? How about a bigger cross-section of riders, maybe someone over (gasp!) 6 feet? Nothing against shorter people, mind you - but get some big 'ol boys on them scoots, Hoss! __________________ Scott "Cactusjack" Hanks VBA #00105 H.O.G. #4250060 2011 H-D Ultra Limited 103ci :: 2011 HD Electra Glide Ultra Limited w/Stage 1 :: Rallies: Mesquite '08\|Custer '09\|Cortez '10\|Crescent City '11\|Kanab '12\|Antlers '12\|Estes Park '13\|Antlers '13\|Orofino '14\|The Dalles '17
	0

09-08-2008, 09:46 PM	#11
coacha Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Haysville, KS Posts: 6,259	Motorcycle Cruiser Nomad comparison I'm glad someone else noticed the sizes of these editorial types. Seems like they are all a little on the diminutive size. They should get Todd and Davidjones to do the tests. __________________ Ron "Coach" Allan, Haysville, KS 1999 Nomad Wine and Red "KawaTanker" 2009 BMW R1200RT 2003 BMW K1200LT "Magic Carpet" DOA 11/7/2015 VBA #00291 IBA # 41995 DS #320 '08 Elkins, WV; '09 Helen, GA; '09 Custer, SD; '10 Stanton, VA; '11 Maggie Valley; '12 Townsend, TN; '13 Estes Park; '13 Blairsville, GA; '15 Eureka Springs; '16 Helen; '18 Custer, SD
	0

09-08-2008, 11:14 PM	#12
Idaho Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Pocatello, Idaho Posts: 5,241	Motorcycle Cruiser Nomad comparison Rats, now the secret is out so everyone will have Nads. Actually, I am amazed at how much better the Nomad is in the twisties than my old Volusia was. Lot's more power and so much more stable in the corners that it is striking. Volusia used to bounce in corners and had a hard time holding a line, lots of shifting to drive the thing. Nomad just cruises gracefully in 5th gear. Thanks for the post Dan. __________________ Idaho (aka Curmudgeon) Blue Knights Idaho III VBA #110 VROC #24864 IBA #49753 2007 Nomad 86,000 miles Bud Smalley Pocatello, Idaho Idaho Jack Adapter
	0

09-09-2008, 12:14 AM	#13
rksaw Sr. Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Damascus, OR Posts: 1,430	Motorcycle Cruiser Nomad comparison Hey, I don't care if the secret is out. The Nomad deserves to be in 1st place! It's a great bike, with classic lines, plenty of power, lots of room in the hard bags. What is there not to like? Maybe with more looking and buying the 'Mad, more will be joining the forum as well. Rich
	0

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Motorcycle Cruiser - Nomad Shootout	jlreeves	Vulcan Nomad/Vaquero/Voyager	8	08-05-2011 06:50 PM
Motorcycle Cruiser article	cactusjack	Vulcan Nomad/Vaquero/Voyager	18	08-02-2011 10:19 PM
Rickyboy's Nomad Featured in Motorcycle Cruiser	burly	Canada West Group	6	05-10-2010 10:56 PM
Motorcycle Cruiser Magazine	cactusjack	Off-Topic	18	07-18-2008 05:18 PM
Motorcycle Cruiser magazine	racinchef	Off-Topic	1	06-22-2008 02:19 AM