View Full Version : Lowered Nomad
Jared
03-07-2011, 11:40 PM
Is there anyone who has lowered the suspension on their Nomad? I know the Nomad already has poor clearance, but I would love to see a custom Nomad with a lower, lengthened appearance. Anyone ever seen anything like that?
ve3hzz
03-08-2011, 12:03 AM
Is there anyone who has lowered the suspension on their Nomad? I know the Nomad already has poor clearance, but I would love to see a custom Nomad with a lower, lengthened appearance. Anyone ever seen anything like that?
Jared, check VROC I do remember a few years ago a member who did lower it with shorter shocks and stiffer springs with a progressive front end if I remember correctly. It looked like a tail dragger like some slammed chevy's from the 60's. I also think it had a mean streak engine in it and a bunch of performance upgrades. It was a show bike I believe.
It was yellow and purple and green if I remember correctly. It was cool. If I find it I'll post a pic and the members ID. If someone else know that I'm sure they will chime in. I don't think it was ridden much more of a trailer queen (memory) as it was pretty low. I think they were AIR shocks and it may have had some other mods for the suspension. I do remember it was a solo setup and the seat was a custom one off too, like the ones on HD choppers etc.
If I was good at drawing I bet I could relay some of the look.
Damn now you got me thinking....great hours of searching now...LOL..
Wish I had saved a pic of it. It was unique for sure. But other then the bags (no strips with a mural?) it didn't look like a Nomad to me. I don't think the tank was original either so it may have been a 99?
Maybe it was just the bags on another bike. Wheels were also changed (front anyway as you can see it).
Maybe this has jogged someone else's memory....or I had a psychotic break and dreamed it all http://s2.images.proboards.com/tongue.gif
Jared, When I bought mine, it had already been lowered using shorter progressive rear shocks, although I didn't know it at the time.. Rode it probably 5K miles before I realised it was different than other Nomads. No dragging issues (unless I drop off of a really bad drive or something like that). I have since had the chance to ride other Nomads and don't find anything disagreeable about them, BUT I like mine better with the lower feel. Really feels conected to the road, and have a sense of riding down in the bike, not on it.
Also, I don't find the bike heavy feeling or hard to operate at low speeds. In fact, I almost never put my feet down now while stopping, unless of course, I have to wait. Kind of like the look too. It is noticeable, even when not parked next to another Nomad.
danimal2
03-08-2011, 08:26 AM
Can't say for sure, but I think mine's been dropped an inch or two. It seems to squat a bit more than the other 99's I've seen.
There's definitely a downward angle on the pipes and it seems like there's less tire showing than I've seen on most. It'll drag pipe coming out of my driveway unless I really ease it down (which of course I always do now that I know it can happen). Also notice the bike doesn't lean as much when on the side stand.
The first photo is mine. The second one is just a random picture I got off the internet when I was contemplating white walls. They're sitting at roughly the same angle.
Paul, are the shocks labeled? Do they re-work the stock shocks, or are they a replacement deal? Just curious if there's some way I could know for sure whether mine's been dropped. Thanks
http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg129/Squirtcha/Motorcycle%20shots/minesideshot.jpg
http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg129/Squirtcha/Motorcycle%20shots/whitewalls.jpg
ringadingh
03-08-2011, 09:26 AM
Measure the length of the shock and compare it against a stock oem shock. A few guys have used shorter shocks before, but like mentioned It will scrape the pipes a little sooner.
danimal2
03-08-2011, 10:00 AM
I'll do that (measure) and snap a photo the next time I pull the bags off it.
coacha
03-08-2011, 10:06 AM
Mine is lowered when we are all loaded up :)
Kawhead
03-08-2011, 10:17 AM
I lowered my first Nomad and I really didn't care for the way she handled and the pipes scraped to easily. I did like, as mentioned, the feeling of riding in the bike and not on it. The cons out weighed the pros for my taste, but other folks like it.
I would definitely ask some kind hearted fellow if I could try his lowered Nomad, because once you invest about $400 into a set of progressive shocks, they're yours like 'em or not.
Jared
03-08-2011, 01:18 PM
I lowered my first Nomad and I really didn't care for the way she handled and the pipes scraped to easily. I did like, as mentioned, the feeling of riding in the bike and not on it. The cons out weighed the pros for my taste, but other folks like it.
I would definitely ask some kind hearted fellow if I could try his lowered Nomad, because once you invest about $400 into a set of progressive shocks, they're yours like 'em or not.
Your the first one with a 1600 who's done it. Perhaps it makes a difference? Do you have any before and after pics?
Danimal, the shocks are not marked as to size, but the shallower lean angle when your bike is on the side stand is a clue. Sounds like your's are shorter. To those who complain about dragging, I did have a little more dragging until I set the rebound to the next to last setting. Since then, (about 18 months ago) I can't remember dragging even once. Oh, and progessives are a replacement shock.
ndbigfish
03-08-2011, 09:19 PM
Jared,
I lowered the first Nomad, but not my second Nomad. I dropped the front and rear an inch. I liked the feel but didn't like the dragging of the aftermarket pipes. May not scrape the stock pipes. I have the stock pipes back on it now, but it is a garage maiden.
Danimal the ends of the forks extended above the triple tree the amount mine was lowered on my 99'. I had one inch above the top of the triple tree. The 99' is in the signature pictures.
Kawhead
03-09-2011, 02:01 AM
I lowered my first Nomad and I really didn't care for the way she handled and the pipes scraped to easily. I did like, as mentioned, the feeling of riding in the bike and not on it. The cons out weighed the pros for my taste, but other folks like it.
I would definitely ask some kind hearted fellow if I could try his lowered Nomad, because once you invest about $400 into a set of progressive shocks, they're yours like 'em or not.
Your the first one with a 1600 who's done it. Perhaps it makes a difference? Do you have any before and after pics?I'll look and see if I ca find an after pic, I believe the one in my sig is a before. I have to be more specific about the shocks. They were 11" or 11.5" HD Progressive whichever is the shortest shock they make. It would rub the stock pipes with little effort, and got a little spooky on the interstate circular on and off ramps
I don't believe I'm the first to lower (the rear) a 1600 Nomad. I believe I'm the first to do it and admit it. http://s2.images.proboards.com/grin.gif
To sum it up, I went to the lower shock to make it comfortable at traffic lights and stop signs, I have a 29" inseam. It handled differently and wasn't crazy about it. To me, I felt like I had to drive it.
Anyway, a deer hit me and totaled my poor Nomad and I got me another one with no plans to change the stock shocks
Here's an after pic: http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb50/toddf1_2007/IMG_0669.jpg
I'm kidding, I'll look for another. http://s2.images.proboards.com/grin.gif
Jared
03-09-2011, 02:06 AM
Your the first one with a 1600 who's done it. Perhaps it makes a difference? Do you have any before and after pics?I'll look and see if I ca find an after pic, I believe the one in my sig is a before. I have to be more specific about the shocks. They were 11" or 11.5" HD Progressive whichever is the shortest shock they make. It would rub the stock pipes with little effort, and got a little spooky on the interstate circular on and off ramps
I don't believe I'm the first to lower (the rear) a 1600 Nomad. I believe I'm the first to do it and admit it. http://s2.images.proboards.com/grin.gif
To sum it up, I went to the lower shock to make it comfortable at traffic lights and stop signs, I have a 29" inseam. It handled differently and wasn't crazy about it. To me, I felt like I had to drive it.
Anyway, a deer hit me and totaled my poor Nomad and I got me another one with no plans to change the stock shocks
Here's an after pic: http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb50/toddf1_2007/IMG_0669.jpg
I'm kidding, I'll look for another. http://s2.images.proboards.com/grin.gif
Poor deer. :'( :'( :'( :'( ;)
danimal2
03-09-2011, 10:00 AM
Jared,
the ends of the forks extended above the triple tree the amount mine was lowered on my 99'. I had one inch above the top of the triple tree. The 99' is in the signature pictures.
They didn't do the front of mine. The tube tops are even with the triple tree. Maybe that would explain why my bike's front end has a tendency to want to flop over at a certain point while doing slow manuvers.
Loafer
03-09-2011, 12:45 PM
[quote author=ndbigfish board=general thread=22428 post=337896 time=1299637183]Maybe that would explain why my bike's front end has a tendency to want to flop over at a certain point while doing slow manuvers.
My Nomad is stock and it has always flopped over at slow speeds. Found out the hard way. I have learned to shift my weight even more when driving slow and turning. Also helps if you can keep the bike straight upright while turning. Rather then letting it lean. ;)
Kawhead
03-09-2011, 01:38 PM
Jared,
the ends of the forks extended above the triple tree the amount mine was lowered on my 99'. I had one inch above the top of the triple tree. The 99' is in the signature pictures.
They didn't do the front of mine if that's the case. Maybe that would explain why my bike's front end has a tendency to want
to flop over at a certain point while doing slow manuvers. Yeah, thats another thing my Nomad did after I lowered the rear. In a slow turn the bars wanted to keep turning. Like I mentioned before, I had to drive the dern thing.
Your suppose to ride a bike not drive it. I heard that on TV somewhere so it mussbe true. http://s2.images.proboards.com/cheesy.gif
MAS Tequila
03-09-2011, 05:11 PM
If anybody wants to try lowering the back, I have a set of Progressive 440 HD's in the 11.5" variety.
I'll make someone a killer deal.
MT
danimal2
03-09-2011, 05:41 PM
What length are the stock shocks and are they measured center of eye to center of eye?
[quote author=danimal2 board=general thread=22428 post=338018 time=1299682820]
I heard that on TV somewhere so it mussbe true. http://s2.images.proboards.com/cheesy.gif
esgottabe.
Kawhead
03-10-2011, 01:11 AM
What length are the stock shocks and are they measured center of eye to center of eye?
[quote author=danimal2 board=general thread=22428 post=338018 time=1299682820]
I heard that on TV somewhere so it mussbe true. http://s2.images.proboards.com/cheesy.gif
esgottabeI don't know the answer to the fisrst half of the question. A WAG is more than 12 and maybe 13 inches. Your WAG could not be more absolutely correcter, shocks are measured center eye to center eye.
danimal2
03-10-2011, 09:55 AM
I'm guessing it's not lowered then. Pulled a bag off and measured the shock. It's 12 1/4" at rest center of eye to center of eye. I looked up shocks for a 99 Nomad on ebay just for comparison's sake. Even though none of them looked like mine, I suspect these shocks are stockers? Funny though........it sure seems to sit lower than most.
http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg129/Squirtcha/Motorcycle%20shots/DSCF1552.jpg
http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg129/Squirtcha/Motorcycle%20shots/DSCF1551.jpg
minst7877
03-10-2011, 08:57 PM
Stock length as far as I know is 12 1/2 inches. They are that on my buddies Classic and they use the same shock. Danimal2 those look just like the ones on my 99 nad
DC
talon
03-14-2011, 02:10 PM
Jared,
Instead of actually "lowering" the bike, I changed tire size in the back. It did lower the rear of the bike enough to make a difference without dragging. I use the ME 880's and they did not have one of stock size at the time, so I went with one that was one notch lower and one notch wider. Really like the feel.
Later,
T
azroundboy
03-20-2011, 05:43 PM
what is the size of that tire I love my 880's and would like this info
talon
03-28-2011, 12:26 PM
If I am not mistaken, it is a 150\80\16; but I will have to look to make sure. I will post after I get home. I just got back from riding 1400 miles and they still handle great.
T
talon
03-28-2011, 12:29 PM
Sorry, that is the stock size. Like I said, I will look and post again after I get home from work.
T
talon
03-31-2011, 11:25 PM
It is a Metzler 180/60/16 on the rear tire and it rides great. Hope that helps.
T
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.